欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系对比及启示(下)

王蕾, 汪贞, 古文, 范德玲, 周林军, 刘济宁, 石利利. 欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系对比及启示(下)[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2021, 16(6): 37-44. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210728002
引用本文: 王蕾, 汪贞, 古文, 范德玲, 周林军, 刘济宁, 石利利. 欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系对比及启示(下)[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2021, 16(6): 37-44. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210728002
Wang Lei, Wang Zhen, Gu Wen, Fan Deling, Zhou Linjun, Liu Jining, Shi Lili. Comparative Study and Enlightenment on Chemical Environmental Emission Scenarios in Europe, America and Japan (Part 2)[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2021, 16(6): 37-44. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210728002
Citation: Wang Lei, Wang Zhen, Gu Wen, Fan Deling, Zhou Linjun, Liu Jining, Shi Lili. Comparative Study and Enlightenment on Chemical Environmental Emission Scenarios in Europe, America and Japan (Part 2)[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2021, 16(6): 37-44. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210728002

欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系对比及启示(下)

    作者简介: 王蕾(1983-),女,博士研究生,研究方向为化学品环境风险评估,E-mail:wanglei@nies.org
    通讯作者: 周林军, E-mail: zhoulj@nies.org 石利利, E-mail: sll@nies.org
  • 基金项目:

    国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFC1801502)

  • 中图分类号: X171.5

Comparative Study and Enlightenment on Chemical Environmental Emission Scenarios in Europe, America and Japan (Part 2)

    Corresponding authors: Zhou Linjun, zhoulj@nies.org ;  Shi Lili, sll@nies.org
  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 本文在对比欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系异同、解析我国现有化学物质环境暴露评估技术的基础上,分析我国化学物质环境排放场景体系的不足并提出进一步完善的建议。欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系均包含层级化的环境排放估值原则、涵盖多种排放源类型和排放模型,适用于不同层级的环境风险评估,具体技术细节根据各国或地区化学物质环境管理要求等实际情况做出不同设计。这一特点启示我们:完善我国化学物质环境排放场景体系须首先确定化学物质环境排放场景层级框架,明确各层级排放估值原则、排放场景构建计划和方法,建立化学物质排放场景相关导则或规范的制修订工作制度。在此基础上,推进化学物质环境排放场景体系在国内的应用,并根据我国化学物质相关行业发展情况不断更新完善。
  • 加载中
  • 王蕾, 汪贞,古文,等, 欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系对比及启示(上)[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2021, 16(6):1-9

    Wang L, Wang Z, Gu W, et al. Comparative study and enlightenment on chemical environmental emission scenarios in Europe, America and Japan (Part 1)[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2021, 16(6):1-9(in Chinese)

    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Guidance Document on Emission Scenario Documents. OECD Series on Emission Scenario Documents[S]. Paris:Environment Directorate Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology/OECD, 2000
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 294, Matrix between Emission Scenario Documents (ESDs) and Specific Environmental Release Categories (SPERCs)[S]. Paris:Environment Directorate Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology/OECD, 2018
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Exposure Assessment Tools by Approaches:Indirect Estimation (Scenario Evaluation)[EB/OL] (2020-11-12)[2021-07-25]. https://www.epa.gov/expobox/exposure-assessment-tools-approaches-indirect-estimation-scenario-evaluation
    Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan. Emission factor tables for risk assessment under the CSCL (Chemical Substance Control Law)[EB/OL] (2019-7-16)[2021-07-25]. http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/chemical_management/kasinhou/information/ra_emissionfactor.html
    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry; Ministry of Environment. Methods for the Risk Assessment of Priority Assessment Chemical Substances[S]. Tokyo:Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry; Ministry of Environment, 2012
    European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Chapter R15:Consumer Exposure Estimation[S]. Helsinki:European Chemicals Agency, 2016
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Chemical Engineering Branch Compilation of Generic Scenarios[For Industry-specific Workplace Release and Exposure Estimation] [S]. Washington DC:US EPA, 1997
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Chemical Screening Tool for Exposures and Environmental Releases (ChemSTEER) User Guide[S]. Washington DC:US EPA, 2015
    European Chemicals Bureau (ECB). Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment. In Support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Notified Substances, Commission Directive (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing Substances, Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of Council Concerning the Placing of Biocidal Products on the Market. Part Ⅱ[S]. Ispra:Institute for Health and Consumer Protection/European Chemicals Bureau, 2003
    European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Chapter R16:Environmental Exposure Estimation[S]. Helsinki:European Chemicals Agency, 2016
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Exposure and Fate Assessment Screening Tool (E-FAST) (Version 2.0) Documentation Manual[S]. Springfield:Versar, Inc./US EPA, 2007
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Insecticides, Acaricides and Products to Control Other Arthropods for Household and Professional Uses[S]. Paris:Environment Directorate Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology/OECD, 2008
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Blending of Fragrance Oils into Commercial and Consumer Products[S]. Paris:Environment Directorate Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology/OECD, 2010
    European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Chapter R18:Exposure Scenario Building and Environmental Release Estimation for the Waste Life Stage[S]. Helsinki:European Chemicals Agency, 2012
    中华人民共和国生态环境部. 关于发布《化学物质环境与健康危害评估技术导则(试行)》等三项技术导则的公告[S]. (2020-12-24)[2021-7-25]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk01/202012/t20201225_814802.html
    中华人民共和国生态环境部. 可行技术指南[S]. (2021-05-12)[2021-9-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/kxxjszn/
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2184
  • HTML全文浏览数:  2184
  • PDF下载数:  44
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-07-28
王蕾, 汪贞, 古文, 范德玲, 周林军, 刘济宁, 石利利. 欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系对比及启示(下)[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2021, 16(6): 37-44. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210728002
引用本文: 王蕾, 汪贞, 古文, 范德玲, 周林军, 刘济宁, 石利利. 欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系对比及启示(下)[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2021, 16(6): 37-44. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210728002
Wang Lei, Wang Zhen, Gu Wen, Fan Deling, Zhou Linjun, Liu Jining, Shi Lili. Comparative Study and Enlightenment on Chemical Environmental Emission Scenarios in Europe, America and Japan (Part 2)[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2021, 16(6): 37-44. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210728002
Citation: Wang Lei, Wang Zhen, Gu Wen, Fan Deling, Zhou Linjun, Liu Jining, Shi Lili. Comparative Study and Enlightenment on Chemical Environmental Emission Scenarios in Europe, America and Japan (Part 2)[J]. Asian journal of ecotoxicology, 2021, 16(6): 37-44. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20210728002

欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系对比及启示(下)

    通讯作者: 周林军, E-mail: zhoulj@nies.org ;  石利利, E-mail: sll@nies.org
    作者简介: 王蕾(1983-),女,博士研究生,研究方向为化学品环境风险评估,E-mail:wanglei@nies.org
  • 生态环境部南京环境科学研究所, 南京 210042
基金项目:

国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFC1801502)

摘要: 本文在对比欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系异同、解析我国现有化学物质环境暴露评估技术的基础上,分析我国化学物质环境排放场景体系的不足并提出进一步完善的建议。欧美日化学物质环境排放场景体系均包含层级化的环境排放估值原则、涵盖多种排放源类型和排放模型,适用于不同层级的环境风险评估,具体技术细节根据各国或地区化学物质环境管理要求等实际情况做出不同设计。这一特点启示我们:完善我国化学物质环境排放场景体系须首先确定化学物质环境排放场景层级框架,明确各层级排放估值原则、排放场景构建计划和方法,建立化学物质排放场景相关导则或规范的制修订工作制度。在此基础上,推进化学物质环境排放场景体系在国内的应用,并根据我国化学物质相关行业发展情况不断更新完善。

English Abstract

参考文献 (17)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回