高级搜索

中国工业水污染及其成因的deBruyn模型分析

,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

尹怡诚, 刘云国, 刘少博, 郭一明, 胡新将, 李江. 中国工业水污染及其成因的deBruyn模型分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(2): 639-644. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150222
引用本文: 尹怡诚, 刘云国, 刘少博, 郭一明, 胡新将, 李江. 中国工业水污染及其成因的deBruyn模型分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(2): 639-644. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150222
shu
Yin Yicheng, Liu Yunguo, Liu Shaobo, Guo Yiming, Hu Xinjiang, Li Jiang. Character of industrial water pollution in China and its cause analysis based on de Bruyn model[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 639-644. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150222
Citation: Yin Yicheng, Liu Yunguo, Liu Shaobo, Guo Yiming, Hu Xinjiang, Li Jiang. Character of industrial water pollution in China and its cause analysis based on de Bruyn model[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 639-644. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150222
shu

中国工业水污染及其成因的deBruyn模型分析

  • 1.

    湖南大学环境科学与工程学院, 长沙 410082

  • 2.

    湖南大学环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室, 长沙 410082

  • 3.

    湖南大学建筑学院, 长沙 410082

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(41271332)

  • 中图分类号: X323

Character of industrial water pollution in China and its cause analysis based on de Bruyn model

  • 1.

    College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

  • 2.

    Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control, Ministry of Education, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

  • 3.

    Collage of Architecture, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 选取废水、挥发酚、氰化物、COD、石油类和氨氮为中国工业水污染指标,利用分解分析方法将2004—2010年间的污染变化分解为规模效应、结构效应、污染治理效应、清洁技术效应和广义技术效应。结果显示,这5类效应的平均作用强度分别为2.08%、3.04%、15.61%、17.37%和32.88%,其中规模效应和广义技术效应是影响工业水污染的主导效应。各类效应对不同污染物的作用方向并不完全一致,规模效应促进污染物排放量的增加;结构效应以加重污染为主,污染治理效应和清洁技术效应以减轻污染为主;广义技术效应的平均作用强度和负向作用概率均最大,是现阶段中国工业水污染控制最为有效的手段。
    Abstract: Decomposition analysis was applied to decompose Chinese industrial water pollution change into scale effect,structural effect,abatement effect, clean technology effect and generalized technology effect. The wastewater discharge, volatile phenol, cyanide, COD and N-NH3 were selected as industrial wastewater pollution indicators. It turned out that the degrees of the five effects on industrial water pollution were 21.08%,3.04%,15.61%,17.37% and 32.88%, respectively. As can be seen, the industrial water pollution was affected most notably by the scale effect and generalized technology effect. The functional directions of effects varied with different indicators. The scale effect and structural effect were the principal causes of the aggravation of industrial water pollution in China. However, the abatement effect and clean technology effect played active roles in pollution control. Due to the highest pollution reduction efficiency, the generalized technology effect was believed to be the optimal measures against pollution.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 郭志仪,姚惠玲. 中国工业水污染的理论研究与实证检验. 审计与经济研究,2011,26(5): 97-103 Guo Z. Y., Yao H. L. A Theoretical and empirical analysis of China's industrial waste water pollution. Journal of Audit & economics, 2011, 26(5): 97-103 (in Chinese)
    [2] 胡洪营,赵文玉,吴乾元. 工业废水污染治理途径与技术研究发展需求. 环境科学研究,2010,23(7): 861-868 Hu H. Y., Zhao W. Y., Wu Q. Y. Basic strategies and technology requirements for industrial wastewater pollution control. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2010,23(7): 861-868 (in Chinese)
    [3] Shi H., Chertow M., Song Y. Developing country experience with eco-industrial parks:A case study of the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2010, 18(3):191-199
    [4] 孟伟. 中国流域水环境污染综合防治战略. 中国环境科学,2007,27(5): 712-716 Meng W. The strategy of comprehensive pollution prevention and cure of water environment in Chinese watershed. China Environmental Science, 2007, 27(5): 712-716 (in Chinese)
    [5] 杨志峰,程红光. 城市工业水污染控制模拟系统的模型体系. 环境科学学报,2002,22(2): 213-218 Yang Z. F., Cheng H. G. Models in simulation system of urban industrial water pollution control. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2002, 22(2): 213-218 (in Chinese)
    [6] Ma J., Ding Z., Wei G., et al. Sources of water pollution and evolution of water quality in the Wuwei basin of Shiyang river, Northwest China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(2): 1168-1177
    [7] 蒋廉洁. 黄河流域水污染分析与水环境保护措施. 水资源保护,2006,22(1): 64-67 Jiang L. J. Water contamination analysis and water environment protection measures for the Yellow River basin. Water Resources Protection, 2006, 22(1): 64-67 (in Chinese)
    [8] Dasgupta S., Huq M., Wheeler D., et al. Water pollution abatement by Chinese industry: cost estimates and policy implications. Applied Economics, 2001, 33(4): 547-557
    [9] 周静,杨桂山. 江苏省工业污染排放特征及其成因分析. 中国环境科学,2007,27(2): 284-288 Zhou J., Yang G. S. Character of industrial pollution discharge in Jiangsu Province and its cause analysis. China Environmental Science, 2007, 27(2): 284-288 (in Chinese)
    [10] de Bruyn S. M. Explaining the Environmental Kuznets Curve: structural change and international agreements in reducing sulphur emissions, Environment and Development Economics, 1997, 2: 485-503
    [11] 吴巧生,成金华. 中国工业化中的能源消耗强度变动及因素分析——基于分解模型的实证分析. 财经研究,2006, 32(6): 75-85 Wu Q. S., Cheng J. H. Changes in energy consumption intensity and the main factors during the process of China's industrialization:A empirical analysis based on the Decomposition Model. Journal of Finance Economics, 2006, 32(6): 75-85 (in Chinese)
    [12] 王伟林,黄贤金. 区域碳排放强度变化的因素分解模型及实证分析——以江苏省为例. 生态经济,2008,12: 32-35 Wang W.L., Huang X. J. Decompositions model of factors and substantiation analysis of area carbon dioxide emissions intensity change:Take Jiangsu Province as an example. Ecological Economy, 2008, 12: 32-35 (in Chinese)
    [13] 陈六君,王大辉,方福康. 中国污染变化的主要因素—分解模型与实证分析. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2004,40(4): 561-568 Chen L. J., Wang D.H., Fang F. K. The main factors of pollution change in China: Decomposition mode and econometric analysis. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural science), 2004, 40(4): 561-568 (in Chinese)
    [14] Song T., Zheng T., Tong L. An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A panel cointegration approach. China Economic Review, 2008, 19: 381-392
    [15] 卢媛,马小东,孙红文,等. 表面活性剂清洗处理重度石油污染土壤. 环境工程学报,2009,3(8): 1483-1487 Lu Y., Ma X. D., Sun H. W., et al. Surfactant enhanced washing of heavily oil-contaminated soil. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009, 3(8): 1483-1487 (in Chinese)
    [16] 薛勇,陈雷. 石油开采废水处理技术的现状与展望. 吉林建筑工程学院学报,2004,21(3): 45-48 Xue Y., Chen L. The present situation and prospect of treatment technology of oil wastewater. Journal of Jilin Architectural and Civil Engineering Institute, 2004, 21(3): 45-48 (in Chinese)
    [17] Tan X. M. Clean technology R&D and innovation in emerging countries:Experience from China. Energy Policy, 2010, 38 (6): 2916-2926
    [18] 杨朝飞. 完善环境政策体系控制环境污染形势. 中国环保产业,2011,(2): 19-22 Yang C. F. Perfect environmental policy system and control environmental pollution situation. China Environmental Protection Industry, 2011,(2): 19-22 (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2734
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1986
  • PDF下载数:  1078
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-03-01
  • 刊出日期:  2015-02-07
尹怡诚, 刘云国, 刘少博, 郭一明, 胡新将, 李江. 中国工业水污染及其成因的deBruyn模型分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(2): 639-644. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150222
引用本文: 尹怡诚, 刘云国, 刘少博, 郭一明, 胡新将, 李江. 中国工业水污染及其成因的deBruyn模型分析[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(2): 639-644. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150222
shu
Yin Yicheng, Liu Yunguo, Liu Shaobo, Guo Yiming, Hu Xinjiang, Li Jiang. Character of industrial water pollution in China and its cause analysis based on de Bruyn model[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 639-644. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150222
Citation: Yin Yicheng, Liu Yunguo, Liu Shaobo, Guo Yiming, Hu Xinjiang, Li Jiang. Character of industrial water pollution in China and its cause analysis based on de Bruyn model[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 639-644. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150222
shu

中国工业水污染及其成因的deBruyn模型分析

  • 1.  湖南大学环境科学与工程学院, 长沙 410082
  • 2.  湖南大学环境生物与控制教育部重点实验室, 长沙 410082
  • 3.  湖南大学建筑学院, 长沙 410082
  • 收稿日期:  2014-03-01
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(41271332)

摘要: 选取废水、挥发酚、氰化物、COD、石油类和氨氮为中国工业水污染指标,利用分解分析方法将2004—2010年间的污染变化分解为规模效应、结构效应、污染治理效应、清洁技术效应和广义技术效应。结果显示,这5类效应的平均作用强度分别为2.08%、3.04%、15.61%、17.37%和32.88%,其中规模效应和广义技术效应是影响工业水污染的主导效应。各类效应对不同污染物的作用方向并不完全一致,规模效应促进污染物排放量的增加;结构效应以加重污染为主,污染治理效应和清洁技术效应以减轻污染为主;广义技术效应的平均作用强度和负向作用概率均最大,是现阶段中国工业水污染控制最为有效的手段。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (18)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心