| Schwarzenbach R P, Escher B I, Fenner K, et al. The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems[J]. Science, 2006, 313(5790): 1072-1077 |
| Ghisari M, Bonefeld-Jorgensen E C. Effects of plasticizers and their mixtures on estrogen receptor and thyroid hormone functions[J]. Toxicology Letters, 2009, 189(1): 67-77 |
| Parveen M, Inoue A, Ise R, et al. Evaluation of estrogenic activity of phthalate esters by gene expression profiling using a focused microarray (EstrArray©)[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2008, 27(6): 1416-1425 |
| Zhang Q, Lu M Y, Wang C, et al. Characterization of estrogen receptor α activities in polychlorinated biphenyls by in vitro dual-luciferase reporter gene assay[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2014, 189: 169-175 |
| Ahmed S, Valen E, Sandelin A, et al. Dioxin increases the interaction between aryl hydrocarbon receptor and estrogen receptor alpha at human promoters[J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2009, 111(2): 254-266 |
| Hercog K, Maisanaba S, Filipič M, et al. Genotoxic potential of the binary mixture of cyanotoxins microcystin-LR and cylindrospermopsin[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 189: 319-329 |
| Schriks M, Heringa M B, van der Kooi M M, et al. Toxicological relevance of emerging contaminants for drinking water quality[J]. Water Research, 2010, 44(2): 461-476 |
| Carvalho R N, Arukwe A, Ait-Aissa S, et al. Mixtures of chemical pollutants at European legislation safety concentrations: How safe are they?[J]. Toxicological Sciences: An Official Journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2014, 141(1): 218-233 |
| Brack W, Ait-Aissa S, Burgess R M, et al. Effect-directed analysis supporting monitoring of aquatic environments: An in-depth overview[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 544: 1073-1118 |
| Silva E, Rajapakse N, Kortenkamp A. Something from “nothing”: Eight weak estrogenic chemicals combined at concentrations below NOECs produce significant mixture effects[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(8): 1751-1756 |
| Brack W, Escher B I, Müller E, et al. Towards a holistic and solution-oriented monitoring of chemical status of European water bodies: How to support the EU strategy for a non-toxic environment?[J]. Environmental Sciences Europe, 2018, 30(1): 33 |
| Altenburger R, Walter H, Grote M. What contributes to the combined effect of a complex mixture?[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(23): 6353-6362 |
| Altenburger R, Ait-Aissa S, Antczak P, et al. Future water quality monitoring: Adapting tools to deal with mixtures of pollutants in water resource management[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 512-513: 540-551 |
| Altenburger R, Scholz S, Schmitt-Jansen M, et al. Mixture toxicity revisited from a toxicogenomic perspective[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(5): 2508-2522 |
| Brack W, Aissa S A, Backhaus T, et al. Effect-based methods are key. The European Collaborative Project SOLUTIONS recommends integrating effect-based methods for diagnosis and monitoring of water quality[J]. Environmental Sciences Europe, 2019, 31: 10 |
| Schiffelers M J, Blaauboer B J, Hendriksen C F, et al. Regulatory acceptance and use of 3R models: A multilevel perspective[J]. ALTEX, 2012, 29(3): 287-300 |
| Busch W, Schmidt S, Kühne R, et al. Micropollutants in European Rivers: A mode of action survey to support the development of effect-based tools for water monitoring[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2016, 35(8): 1887-1899 |
| Hebert A, Feliers C, Lecarpentier C, et al. Bioanalytical assessment of adaptive stress responses in drinking water: A predictive tool to differentiate between micropollutants and disinfection by-products[J]. Water Research, 2018, 132: 340-349 |
| Escher B I, Allinson M, Altenburger R, et al. Benchmarking organic micropollutants in wastewater, recycled water and drinking water with in vitro bioassays[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(3): 1940-1956 |
| Escher B, Leusch F, Chapman H, et al. Introduction to Bioanalytical Tools in Water Quality Assessment[M]. London: Iwa Publishing, 2012: 1-22 |
| Escher B I, van Daele C, Dutt M, et al. Most oxidative stress response in water samples comes from unknown chemicals: The need for effect-based water quality trigger values[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(13): 7002-7011 |
| Robitaille J, Denslow N D, Escher B I, et al. Towards regulation of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in water resources using bioassays: A guide to developing a testing strategy[J]. Environmental Research, 2022, 205: 112483 |
| Escher B I, Neale P A, Leusch F D L. Effect-based trigger values for in vitro bioassays: Reading across from existing water quality guideline values[J]. Water Research, 2015, 81: 137-148 |
| Escher B I, Aït-Aïssa S, Behnisch P A, et al. Effect-based trigger values for in vitro and in vivo bioassays performed on surface water extracts supporting the environmental quality standards (EQS) of the European Water Framework Directive[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 628-629: 748-765 |
| Escher B I, Lamoree M, Antignac J P, et al. Mixture risk assessment of complex real-life mixtures-the PANORAMIX project[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(20): 12990 |
| Brack W, Dulio V, Ågerstrand M, et al. Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 576: 720-737 |
| van der Oost R, Sileno G, Suárez-Muñoz M, et al. SIMONI (smart integrated monitoring) as a novel bioanalytical strategy for water quality assessment: Part Ⅰ-model design and effect-based trigger values[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2017, 36(9): 2385-2399 |
| Ma X Y, Wang Y K, Dong K, et al. The treatability of trace organic pollutants in WWTP effluent and associated biotoxicity reduction by advanced treatment processes for effluent quality improvement[J]. Water Research, 2019, 159: 423-433 |
| Jia A, Escher B I, Leusch F D, et al. In vitro bioassays to evaluate complex chemical mixtures in recycled water[J]. Water Research, 2015, 80: 1-11 |
| Neale P A, Altenburger R, Aït-Aïssa S, et al. Development of a bioanalytical test battery for water quality monitoring: Fingerprinting identified micropollutants and their contribution to effects in surface water[J]. Water Research, 2017, 123: 734-750 |
| Besselink H, Brouwer B, van der Burg B. Validation and regulatory acceptance of bio-based approaches to assure feedstock, water & product quality in a bio-based economy[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2017, 106: 138-145 |
| Brion F, De Gussem V, Buchinger S, et al. Monitoring estrogenic activities of waste and surface waters using a novel in vivo zebrafish embryonic (EASZY) assay: Comparison with in vitro cell-based assays and determination of effect-based trigger values[J]. Environment International, 2019, 130: 104896 |
| König M, Escher B I, Neale P A, et al. Impact of untreated wastewater on a major European River evaluated with a combination of in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 220(Pt B): 1220-1230 |
| Muschket M, di Paolo C, Tindall A J, et al. Identification of unknown antiandrogenic compounds in surface waters by effect-directed analysis (EDA) using a parallel fractionation approach[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(1): 288-297 |
| Hashmi M A K, Escher B I, Krauss M, et al. Effect-directed analysis (EDA) of Danube River water sample receiving untreated municipal wastewater from Novi Sad, Serbia[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 624: 1072-1081 |
| Kunz P Y, Kienle C, Carere M, et al. In vitro bioassays to screen for endocrine active pharmaceuticals in surface and waste waters[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2015, 106: 107-115 |
| Neale P A, Munz N A, Aït-Aïssa S, et al. Integrating chemical analysis and bioanalysis to evaluate the contribution of wastewater effluent on the micropollutant burden in small streams[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 576: 785-795 |
| Cunningham V L, Binks S P, Olson M J. Human health risk assessment from the presence of human pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment[J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2009, 53(1): 39-45 |
| Houtman C J, Kroesbergen J, Lekkerkerker-Teunissen K, et al. Human health risk assessment of the mixture of pharmaceuticals in Dutch drinking water and its sources based on frequent monitoring data[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 496: 54-62 |
| Baken K A, Sjerps R M A, Schriks M, et al. Toxicological risk assessment and prioritization of drinking water relevant contaminants of emerging concern[J]. Environment International, 2018, 118: 293-303 |
| Been F, Pronk T, Louisse J, et al. Development of a framework to derive effect-based trigger values to interpret CALUX data for drinking water quality[J]. Water Research, 2021, 193: 116859 |
| Brand W, de Jongh C M, van der Linden S C, et al. Trigger values for investigation of hormonal activity in drinking water and its sources using CALUX bioassays[J]. Environment International, 2013, 55: 109-118 |
| World Health Organization. Water quality: Guidelines, standards, and health: Assessment of risk and risk management for water-related infectious disease[R]. London: IWA Publishing, 2001 |
| Jarošová B, Javůrek J, Adamovský O, et al. Phytoestrogens and mycoestrogens in surface waters: Their sources, occurrence, and potential contribution to estrogenic activity[J]. Environment International, 2015, 81: 26-44 |
| Matsuoka S, Kikuchi M, Kimura S, et al. Determination of estrogenic substances in the water of Muko River using in vitro assays, and the degradation of natural estrogens by aquatic bacteria[J]. Journal of Health Science, 2005, 51(2): 178-184 |
| Leusch F D, Neale P A, Hebert A, et al. Analysis of the sensitivity of in vitro bioassays for androgenic, progestagenic, glucocorticoid, thyroid and estrogenic activity: Suitability for drinking and environmental waters[J]. Environment International, 2017, 99: 120-130 |
| Jarošová B, Bláha L, Giesy J P, et al. What level of estrogenic activity determined by in vitro assays in municipal waste waters can be considered as safe?[J]. Environment International, 2014, 64: 98-109 |
| Dingemans M M, Baken K A, van der Oost R, et al. Risk-based approach in the revised European Union drinking water legislation: Opportunities for bioanalytical tools[J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2019, 15(1): 126-134 |
| Kase R, Javurkova B, Simon E, et al. Screening and risk management solutions for steroidal estrogens in surface and wastewater[J]. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 102: 343-358 |
| Neale P A, Braun G, Brack W, et al. Assessing the mixture effects in in vitro bioassays of chemicals occurring in small agricultural streams during rain events[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(13): 8280-8290 |
| Neale P A, Leusch F D L. Assessing the role of different dissolved organic carbon and bromide concentrations for disinfection by-product formation using chemical analysis and bioanalysis[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(17): 17100-17109 |
| Escher B I, Neale P A. Effect-based trigger values for mixtures of chemicals in surface water detected with in vitro bioassays[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2021, 40(2): 487-499 |
| Zwart D, Sterkenburg A. Toxicity-based assessment of water quality[J]. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology, 2002, 1: 383-402 |
| Raimondo S, Montague B J, Barron M G. Determinants of variability in acute to chronic toxicity ratios for aquatic invertebrates and fish[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2007, 26(9): 2019-2023 |
| Li H Z, Cheng F, Wei Y L, et al. Global occurrence of pyrethroid insecticides in sediment and the associated toxicological effects on benthic invertebrates: An overview[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 324(Pt B): 258-271 |
| Zeng S Y, Huang Y Q, Sun F, et al. Probabilistic ecological risk assessment of effluent toxicity of a wastewater reclamation plant based on process modeling[J]. Water Research, 2016, 100: 367-376 |
| Xu J Y, Zhao C T, Wei D B, et al. A toxicity-based method for evaluating safety of reclaimed water for environmental reuses[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 2014, 26(10): 1961-1969 |
| Bittner M, Saul N, Steinberg C E W. Antiandrogenic activity of humic substances[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 432: 93-96 |
| Saebelfeld M, Minguez L, Griebel J, et al. Humic dissolved organic carbon drives oxidative stress and severe fitness impairments in Daphnia[J]. Aquatic Toxicology, 2017, 182: 31-38 |
| Dehkordi S K, Paknejad H, Blaha L, et al. Instrumental and bioanalytical assessment of pharmaceuticals and hormone-like compounds in a major drinking water source: Wastewater receiving Zayandeh Rood River, Iran[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(6): 9023-9037 |
| Leusch F D L, Neale P A, Arnal C, et al. Analysis of endocrine activity in drinking water, surface water and treated wastewater from six countries[J]. Water Research, 2018, 139: 10-18 |
| Alygizakis N A, Besselink H, Paulus G K, et al. Characterization of wastewater effluents in the Danube River Basin with chemical screening, in vitro bioassays and antibiotic resistant genes analysis[J]. Environment International, 2019, 127: 420-429 |
| Tousova Z, Oswald P, Slobodnik J, et al. European demonstration program on the effect-based and chemical identification and monitoring of organic pollutants in European surface waters[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 601-602: 1849-1868 |
| Ekman Drew R, Ankley Gerald T, Blazer Vicki S, et al. Environmental reviews and case studies: Biological effects–based tools for monitoring impacted surface waters in the great lakes: A multiagency program in support of the great lakes restoration initiative[J]. Environmental Practice, 2013, 15(4): 409-426 |
| Müller M E, Werneburg M, Glaser C, et al. Influence of emission sources and tributaries on the spatial and temporal patterns of micropollutant mixtures and associated effects in a small river[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2020, 39(7): 1382-1391 |
| Houtman C J, Brewster K, Ten Broek R, et al. Characterisation of (anti-) progestogenic and (anti-) androgenic activities in surface and wastewater using high resolution effectdirected analysis[J]. Environment International, 2021, 153: 106536 |
| Johann S, Esser M, Nüßer L, et al. Receptor-mediated estrogenicity of native and chemically dispersed crude oil determined using adapted microscale reporter gene assays[J]. Environment International, 2020, 134: 105320 |
| He X W, Qi Z D, Gao J, et al. Nonylphenol ethoxylates biodegradation increases estrogenicity of textile wastewater in biological treatment systems[J]. Water Research, 2020, 184: 116137 |
| Simon E, Riegraf C, Schifferli A, et al. Evaluation of three ISO estrogen receptor transactivation assays applied to 52 domestic effluent samples[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2022, 41(10): 2512-2526 |
| Neale P A, Feliers C, Glauch L, et al. Application of in vitro bioassays for water quality monitoring in three drinking water treatment plants using different treatment processes including biological treatment, nanofiltration and ozonation coupled with disinfection[J]. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2020, 6(9): 2444-2453 |
| Escher B I, Dutt M, Maylin E, et al. Water quality assessment using the AREc32 reporter gene assay indicative of the oxidative stress response pathway[J]. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 2012, 14(11): 2877-2885 |
| Phan L T, Schaar H, Reif D, et al. Long-term toxicological monitoring of a multibarrier advanced wastewater treatment plant comprising ozonation and granular activated carbon with in vitro bioassays[J]. Water, 2021, 13(22): 3245 |
| Völker J, Stapf M, Miehe U, et al. Systematic review of toxicity removal by advanced wastewater treatment technologies via ozonation and activated carbon[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(13): 7215-7233 |
| Escher B I, Glauch L, König M, et al. Baseline toxicity and volatility cutoff in reporter gene assays used for high-throughput screening[J]. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 2019, 32(8): 1646-1655 |
| Escher B I, Henneberger L, König M, et al. Cytotoxicity burst? Differentiating specific from nonspecific effects in Tox21in vitro reporter gene assays[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2020, 128(7): 77007 |
| Wang Y K, Wang X C, Ma X Y. Micropollutants and biological effects as control indexes for the operation and design of shallow open-water unit ponds to Polish domestic effluent[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 418: 126306 |
| van Ede K I, van Duursen M B M, van den Berg M. Evaluation of relative effect potencies (REPs) for dioxin-like compounds to derive systemic or human-specific TEFs to improve human risk assessment[J]. Archives of Toxicology, 2016, 90(6): 1293-1305 |
| Serra H, Brion F, Chardon C, et al. Estrogenic activity of surface waters using zebrafish- and human-based in vitro assays: The Danube as a case-study[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2020, 78: 103401 |
| Daniels K D, VanDervort D, Wu S M, et al. Downstream trends of in vitro bioassay responses in a wastewater effluent-dominated river[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 212: 182-192 |
| Conley J M, Evans N, Cardon M C, et al. Occurrence and in vitro bioactivity of estrogen, androgen, and glucocorticoid compounds in a nationwide screen of United States stream waters[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(9): 4781-4791 |
| Harrill J, Shah I, Setzer R W, et al. Considerations for strategic use of high-throughput transcriptomics chemical screening data in regulatory decisions[J]. Current Opinion in Toxicology, 2019, 15: 64-75 |
| Bourdon-Lacombe J A, Moffat I D, Deveau M, et al. Technical guide for applications of gene expression profiling in human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals[J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2015, 72(2): 292-309 |
| Krewski D, Acosta D Jr, Andersen M, et al. Toxicity testing in the 21st Century: A vision and a strategy[J]. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B, Critical Reviews, 2010, 13(2-4): 51-138 |
| Schuijt L M, Peng F J, van den Berg S J P, et al. (Eco)toxicological tests for assessing impacts of chemical stress to aquatic ecosystems: Facts, challenges, and future[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 795: 148776 |