高级搜索

碳源投加方式对SBR工艺脱氮速率的影响

,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

张兰河, 丘晓春, 张宇, 庞香蕊, 刘鹤楠. 碳源投加方式对SBR工艺脱氮速率的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(2): 731-736. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150237
引用本文: 张兰河, 丘晓春, 张宇, 庞香蕊, 刘鹤楠. 碳源投加方式对SBR工艺脱氮速率的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(2): 731-736. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150237
shu
Zhang Lanhe, Qiu Xiaochun, Zhang Yu, Pang Xiangrui, Liu Henan. Effect of different adding methods of carbon sources on denitrification rate[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 731-736. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150237
Citation: Zhang Lanhe, Qiu Xiaochun, Zhang Yu, Pang Xiangrui, Liu Henan. Effect of different adding methods of carbon sources on denitrification rate[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 731-736. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150237
shu

碳源投加方式对SBR工艺脱氮速率的影响

  • 1.

    东北电力大学化学工程学院, 吉林 132012

  • 2.

    辽宁大学环境学院, 沈阳 110036

  • 基金项目:

    吉林省科技发展计划项目(20130303080SF,20110405)

    吉林省省校合作技术开发项目(吉工信科技2011-507)

  • 中图分类号: X703.1

Effect of different adding methods of carbon sources on denitrification rate

  • 1.

    School of Chemical Engineering, Northeast Dianli University, Jilin 132012, China

  • 2.

    College of Environmental Sciences, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 为了提高生物反应器的脱氮效率,研究采用SBR处理模拟生活污水,利用醋酸钠作为碳源,考察碳源投加方式对脱氮速率的影响。结果表明,当温度为10~15℃,进水COD为330~550 mg/L时,采用不同的碳源投加方式,COD去除率均高于95%。进水一次投加2.4 g碳源,COD平均反应速率为5.3 mg/(g·h),平均反硝化速率为0.28 mg/(g·h)。进水、反应器运行3 h时分别投加1.2 g碳源,COD平均反应速率为6.89 mg/(g·h),平均反硝化速率为0.37 mg/(g·h)。进水、反应6 h时分别投加1.2 g碳源,COD平均反应速率为6.50 mg/(g·h),平均反硝化速率为0.52 mg/(g·h)。进水投加1.2 g碳源、反应器运行3 h和6 h时分别投加0.6 g醋酸钠碳源,COD平均反应速率为6.2 mg/(g·h),平均反硝化速率为0.39 mg/(g·h)。分次投加碳源能够提高COD反应速率和TN去除率,同时保持较高的硝化反硝化速率。
    Abstract: In order to improve the denitrification efficiency of biological reactor, the SBR process was adopted to treat the simulated sewage when sodium acetate was used as a carbon source. Effects of the different addition methods of carbon sources on the denitrification rate were investigated. The results show that removal efficiencies of COD are all higher than 95% by using different addition methods of carbon sources when influent COD is 330~550 mg/L at 10~15℃. When 2.4 g of carbon source is added in the influent wastewater, the average reaction rates of COD and denitrification rates are 5.30 g/(g·h) and 0.28 g/(g·h), respectively. When 1.2 g of carbon source is respective added in the influent wastewater and at 3h of operation time, the average reaction rates of COD and denitrification rates are 6.89 mg/(g·h) and 0.37 mg/(g·h), respectively. The average reaction rates of COD and denitrification rates are 6.5 mg/(g·h) and 0.52 mg/(g·h), respectively, when 1.2 g of carbon source is added in the influent wastewater and at 6 h of operation time, respectively. The average reaction rates of COD and denitrification rates are 6.2 mg/(g·h) and 0.39 mg/(g·h), respectively, when 1.2 g, 0.6 g and 0.6 g of carbon source is added in the influent wastewater and at 3 h and 6 h of operation time. Reaction rates of COD and removal rates of total nitrogen can be improved and high nitrification rate and denitrification rate can be maintained when carbon source is added in several steps.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Bernat K., Wojnowska-Baryła I., Dobrzyńska A. Denitrification with endogenous carbon source at low C/N and its effect on P(3HB) accumulation. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(7): 2410-2418
    [2] 贾艳萍, 贾心倩, 刘印, 等. 同步硝化反硝化脱氮机理及影响因素研究. 东北电力大学学报, 2013, 33(4): 19-23 Jia Yanping, Jia Xinqian, Liu Yin, et al. The study on nitrogen removal mechanism and affecting factors of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. Journal of Northeast Dianli University, 2013, 33(4): 19-23 (in Chinese)
    [3] Kulkarni P. M. Effect of shock and mixed loading on the performance of SND based sequencing batch reactors (SBR) degrading nitrophenols. Water Research, 2012, 46(7): 2405-2414
    [4] 陈柏成, 马卓汝, 唐美珍. 外加碳源对SBR法处理生活污水的影响研究. 绿色科技, 2012, 9(2): 166-171 Chen Baicheng, Ma Zhuoru, Tang Meizhen. Effects of external carbon source on processing of beer wastewater according to SBR law. Journal of Green Science and Technology, 2012, 9(2): 166-171 (in Chinese)
    [5] Lan C. J., Kumar M., Wang C. C., et al. Development of simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox and denitrification (SNAD) process in a sequential batch reactor. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(9): 5514- 5519
    [6] Torà J. A., Baeza J. A., Carrera J., et al. Denitritation of a high-strength nitrite wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor using different organic carbon sources. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 172(2-3): 994-998
    [7] 张万友, 张兰河, 杨涛, 等. 不同有机碳源对SBR工艺同步硝化反硝化影响. 化工进展, 2010, 29(12): 2395-2399 Zhang Wanyou, Zhang Lanhe, Yang Tao, et al. Effects of organic carbon on simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in sequencing batch reactor. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2010, 29(12): 2395-2399 (in Chinese)
    [8] 胡宇华, 丁富新, 范轶, 等. 有机碳源对同时硝化/反硝化(SND)过程的影响. 环境工程, 2001, 19(4): 17-20 Hu Yuhua, Ding Fuxin, Fan Yi, et al. Efects of organic carbon resource on process of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND). Environmental Engineering, 2001, 19(4): 17-20 (in Chinese)
    [9] Ge Shijian, Peng Yongzhen, Wang Shuying, et al. Nitrite accumulation under constant temperature in anoxic denitrification process: The effects of carbon sources and COD/NO3--N. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 114(3): 137-143
    [10] 高景峰, 彭永臻, 王淑莹. SBR法反硝化过程模糊控制器的设计和碳源投加方式的选择. 环境科学学报, 2003, 23(6): 733-737 Gao Jingfeng, Peng Yongzhen, Wang Shuying. The construction of fuzzy controller of denitrification in SBR process and the choice of carbon addition method. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2003, 23(6): 733-737 (in Chinese)
    [11] 操家顺, 侯梁浩, 方芳, 等. 温度及外加碳源对生物脱氮除磷过程的影响. 环境工程学报, 2013, 7(6): 2013-2018 Cao Jiashun, Hou Lianghao, Fang Fang, et al. Effect of temperature and external carbon source on simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(6): 2013-2018 (in Chinese)
    [12] 魏复盛. 水和废水监测分析方法(第4版). 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002
    [13] Seviour T. M., Donose B. C., Pijuan M., et al. Purification and conformational analysis of a key exopolysaccharide component of mixed culture aerobic sludge granules. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(12): 4729-4734
    [14] Zhang Hanmin, Dong Feng, Jiang Tao, et al. Aerobic granulation with low strength wastewater at low aeration rate in A/O/A SBR reactor. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2011, 49(2): 215-222
    [15] 蔡碧婧, 谢丽, 杨殿海, 等. 反硝化脱氮工艺补充碳源选择与优化研究进展. 净水技术, 2007, 26(6): 37-41 Cai Bijing, Xie Li, Yang Dianhai, et al. A review on carbon source supplement and optimization in denitrification process. Water Purification Technology, 2007, 26(6): 37-41 (in Chinese)
    [16] 祖波, 张代钧, 祖建, 等. 硝化过程中影响亚硝酸盐积累的因素. 环境科学与技术, 2009, 32(4): 1-5 Zu Bo, Zhang Daijun, Zu Jian, et al. Factors affecting nitrite accumulation in nitrification process. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 32(4): 1-5 (in Chinese)
    [17] Aslan S., Miller L., Dahab M. Ammonium oxidation via nitrite accumulation under limited oxygen concentration in sequencing batch reactors. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(2): 659-664
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2405
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1817
  • PDF下载数:  1002
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-06-27
  • 刊出日期:  2015-02-07
张兰河, 丘晓春, 张宇, 庞香蕊, 刘鹤楠. 碳源投加方式对SBR工艺脱氮速率的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(2): 731-736. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150237
引用本文: 张兰河, 丘晓春, 张宇, 庞香蕊, 刘鹤楠. 碳源投加方式对SBR工艺脱氮速率的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2015, 9(2): 731-736. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150237
shu
Zhang Lanhe, Qiu Xiaochun, Zhang Yu, Pang Xiangrui, Liu Henan. Effect of different adding methods of carbon sources on denitrification rate[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 731-736. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150237
Citation: Zhang Lanhe, Qiu Xiaochun, Zhang Yu, Pang Xiangrui, Liu Henan. Effect of different adding methods of carbon sources on denitrification rate[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 731-736. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.20150237
shu

碳源投加方式对SBR工艺脱氮速率的影响

  • 1. 东北电力大学化学工程学院, 吉林 132012
  • 2. 辽宁大学环境学院, 沈阳 110036
  • 收稿日期:  2014-06-27
基金项目:

吉林省科技发展计划项目(20130303080SF,20110405)

吉林省省校合作技术开发项目(吉工信科技2011-507)

摘要: 为了提高生物反应器的脱氮效率,研究采用SBR处理模拟生活污水,利用醋酸钠作为碳源,考察碳源投加方式对脱氮速率的影响。结果表明,当温度为10~15℃,进水COD为330~550 mg/L时,采用不同的碳源投加方式,COD去除率均高于95%。进水一次投加2.4 g碳源,COD平均反应速率为5.3 mg/(g·h),平均反硝化速率为0.28 mg/(g·h)。进水、反应器运行3 h时分别投加1.2 g碳源,COD平均反应速率为6.89 mg/(g·h),平均反硝化速率为0.37 mg/(g·h)。进水、反应6 h时分别投加1.2 g碳源,COD平均反应速率为6.50 mg/(g·h),平均反硝化速率为0.52 mg/(g·h)。进水投加1.2 g碳源、反应器运行3 h和6 h时分别投加0.6 g醋酸钠碳源,COD平均反应速率为6.2 mg/(g·h),平均反硝化速率为0.39 mg/(g·h)。分次投加碳源能够提高COD反应速率和TN去除率,同时保持较高的硝化反硝化速率。

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (17)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心